I have a few questions regarding a tenant initiated HP case.
If I [RS tenant] bring an HP case against my LL for failure to repair, can I include suing for damages and breech of warranty of habitability? How far back can I sue for damages (I was told it is 6 years in a non-payment case)?
If I bring an HP case then I am the petitioner, correct?
As a tenant, is there an advantage/disadvantage to being the petitioner in a non-payment case vs. my being the respondent in an HP case when suing for rental abatement?
How about suing for treble damages? What is the basis for this? For example, if LL did not repair and also obstructed HPD from making emergency repairs?
The only defense the LL has is I failed to provide access, which is false. However, he will have his agents lie for him I am certain. How is the burden of proof different if I bring an HP case vs. if LL brings a nonpayment case in which I counterclaim?
Thanks.