TenantNet Forum

Where tenants can seek help and help others



DHCR complaint backlog just a band-aid on severe trauma

NYC Rent Regulation: Rent Control/Rent Stabilized, DHCR Practice/Procedures

Moderator: TenantNet

DHCR complaint backlog just a band-aid on severe trauma

Postby TenantNet » Mon Oct 03, 2022 12:09 pm

Previously on DHCR Presents... (but this only scratches the surface)

How did this all happen? After Assemblymember Pete Grannis published Bleak House (after the Charles Dickens book) exposing DHCR in the 1980's, he lost his Housing Committee Chair, ostensibly for embarrassing the agency and then Governor Mario Cuomo. Since then, the chairs of the Assembly Housing Committee have never given a hard look at DHCR and seem to be more protective of the status quo than pushing for meaningful reform.

Since then every governor, but mostly Andrew Cuomo, has underfunded and understaffed DHCR. Only twenty-seven people looking at 20,000 cases per year? That's 740 cases per person, 14 new cases per week. But understand that's the NEW caseload. Many cases can take years to process. So the load on the examiners is cumulative.

Over the years we have sought to obtain DHCR management reports. We do know they illegally fail to disclose all but two pages of each month's reports (the complete versions were around 30 pages per month).

I suspect they are also releasing fake numbers on the pages they do release (but that will take some further analysis).

We do know that DHCR went to the NYS Attorney General in 1995 seeking to avoid it's statutory obligation to maintain an index of decisions. In addition to bad processing numbers, DHCR is known as the Landlord Protection Agency. Unless one has access to case law, it's difficult to prove their inherent bias against tenants.

For years, we have sought to require DHCR to publish ALL its decisions online, but it has resisted this for many years ... even though the technology has evolved where this is easily doable.

In 1995 we were able to secure and publish approximately 6,000 DHCR decisions. But that was 27 years ago and we know DHCR tends to only release the ones they wish.

It has long been known that DHCR's computer systems are "ancient." Think IBM DOS (Disk Operating System) from the 1980's. Remember "Sneakernet" where to transfer cases from one computer to another, one had to write a file to a floppy disk, put on your sneakers and run across the room or down the hall and insert the floppy into another computer. We hear Nike likes DHCR's customer loyalty.

Apparently, under pressure from the NYS Comptroller, DHCR was supposed to upgrade its Case Management System back in 2014. We hear that didn't happen, and now they have yet a new contract for another Case Management System that - they say - will be implemented. Don't hold your breath.

While there are some good people at the agency, it's usually the administrative higher-up and their legal teams that make huger efforts to keep things secret. With the real estate money flooding Andrew Cuomo's and now Kathryn Hochul's administrations, why would they want a protection agency to actually work?

Even with complete and accurate numbers, it's not just the number of cases they can push through the system that matters; it's the QUALITY of the decisions, how they follow the letter and intent of the law and not use the law as a shield for landlords - that is what really matters.

And tenants are not helping either. You have the con-artist duo Mike McKee and Cea Weaver (now seemingly best friends with the Real Estate Board) with their made-up coalition "Housing Justice for All" still pushing Good Cause Eviction (incredibly weak protections and bad for tenants compared to real rent stabilization) and ignoring any effort to hold DHCR accountable.

So sure, don't be surprised if you file an overcharge complaint and it takes years and years to resolve.

=============
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-rent-increase-complaint-backlog-20221002-uskte24kvrhmzn33ufsdq3jbtq-story.html?oref=csny_firstread_nl
Massive backlog of New York rent hike complaints leaves tenants frustrated, angry
By Bahar Ostadan
NY Daily News
Oct 02, 2022 at 8:00 am

The agency charged with investigating landlords accused of illegally overcharging tenants in rent stabilized apartments is so far backed up that some cases have lingered as long as four years — leaving tenants angry and frustrated.

New York State Assemblywoman Emily Gallagher told the Daily News she learned of the backlog at the Office of Rent Administration while investigating a constituent’s case.

Without an avenue to resolve allegations of overcharging, tenants can find themselves unfairly priced out of their homes.

“If it takes four years to get that money back and you’re still being overcharged the entire time, you can’t afford that apartment,” Andrea Shapiro, a tenant advocate with the Met Council on Housing, told The News. “The implications are huge.”

Under state law, landlords cannot raise rents for rent stabilized apartments beyond statutorily approved hikes — unless they make building-wide or apartment-specific improvements, such as installing a new stove or flooring. Even so, these rent increases need to be approved by the state Department of Homes and Community Renewal.

The conflict arises when a tenant believes the landlord has inflated the value of those upgrades, or in some cases, fabricated them altogether.

Nick LeMessurier is in a battle with his Brooklyn landlord over what he says are unlawful overcharges. After ten years in his rent stabilized, two-bedroom apartment, LeMessurier said his landlord jacked up the rent 20% last year — from $1,650 to $2,000. He claims his landlord told him the apartment was no longer stabilized, something that often happens while a unit is vacant and gets substantially renovated.

But his unit wasn’t vacant or renovated, LeMessurier said. Six months after filing a report, LeMessurier hasn’t heard back.

“When I called them they just told me that no one has been put on the case.”

Now, he said, his landlord is demanding $3,500 per month and threatening eviction.

“The New York rental market right now is vicious,” LeMessurier, a designer, said. “For me to have my housing insecure would mean that I would immediately have to leave the city.”

Officials at the Office of Rent Administration would not confirm how deep the backlog runs, but said that fewer cases are being processed each year after recent office closures and COVID-related court delays. The Office of Rent Administration is a department under the umbrella of the state Department of Homes and Community Renewal.

The agency currently has 27 employees who are responsible for processing over 20,000 complaints of illegal overcharges each year.

Teddy Thomas is a frustrated tenant in Harlem who has been waiting since 2019 for a resolution to a complaint he filed after his landlord hiked his rent following the installation of USB ports and LED lighting. But Thomas said that never happened.

Thomas said he has filed complaints in person, messaged the agency’s commissioner on LinkedIn, and even requested public records from the state about his case to find out what happened. None of his attempts were successful, and he has since moved out of his apartment, he said. With administrative solutions stalled, many tenants have tuned to the courts.

Last month, hundreds of tenants across 11 Harlem buildings whose rent was increased by over $1,500 a month for “individual apartment improvements” — like replacing a stove or toilet — had a class-action suit against their landlords certified.

According to the lawsuit filed by the tenants, the improvements would have had to cost over $83,000 for one tenant to legally justify the monthly rent increases. The landlords didn’t provide evidence of any improvements, the suit states. If the tenants win the lawsuit or reach a settlement, their leases could revert to stabilized rent and some could get paid back for overcharges, according to the tenants’ attorney.

Tenants are getting priced out of their apartments before ORA even reviews their cases, Sam Stein, a housing policy analyst at the Community Service Society of New York, told The News. “What else are they supposed to do?”

“The problem with [the system] is it assumes that tenants know their rights, they have the information that their rights have been violated, and they have the fortitude to go up against their landlord,” Stein said, but they often don’t.

In the meantime, some New Yorkers are clawing at last-ditch efforts like letting landlords try to evict them. John Paraskevopoulos, legislative director for Assemblywoman Gallagher (D-Brooklyn), along with other policy experts said getting assigned a free attorney in housing court is often the quickest way for tenants to get their cases heard.

“But telling people to let the landlord take them to the brink of homelessness?” Paraskevopoulos said. “That should not be our safety net.”
The Tenant Network(tm) for Residential Tenants
Information from TenantNet is from experienced non-attorney tenant
activists and is not considered legal advice.

Subscribe to our Twitter Feed @TenantNet
TenantNet
 
Posts: 10311
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2002 2:01 am
Location: New York City

Return to NYC Rent Regulated Apartments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests