I am in the middle of a dispute in L&T Court with my landlord (LL). Amongst other things, the Small Claims Court (in a separate issue) may award me monies from the LL for return of a Security Depoit and also interset on that deposit.
In short, in L&T the LL seeks rent money from me based on a disputable (and challenged) Preferentail Rent for which a complaint is pending in DHCR.
Upon my next hearing in L&T Court, would it be reasonable for me to take the following position?:
“I am willing to pay the LL 90% of the owed base rent in order to offset the possible outcome of the Small Claims case in which it may be decided that the LL shall owe me money”.