Posted by tenantperson on August 08, 2001 at 23:54:43: In Reply to: Re: This is what: Ace's subject line posted by DUH on August 08, 2001 at 22:03:22: So what? The answer is wrong.: : Actually, the properly registered higher rent is technically the 'legal rent', just not for the current tenant who's paying the properly registered preferential rent. Follow Ups: Note: Posting is disabled in all archives Post a Followup Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : So what? The answer is wrong. : : : : Actually, the properly registered higher rent is technically the 'legal rent', just not for the current tenant who's paying the properly registered preferential rent. Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:
Posted by tenantperson on August 08, 2001 at 23:54:43:
In Reply to: Re: This is what: Ace's subject line posted by DUH on August 08, 2001 at 22:03:22:
So what? The answer is wrong.
: : Actually, the properly registered higher rent is technically the 'legal rent', just not for the current tenant who's paying the properly registered preferential rent.
Follow Ups:
Note: Posting is disabled in all archives Post a Followup
Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : So what? The answer is wrong. : : : : Actually, the properly registered higher rent is technically the 'legal rent', just not for the current tenant who's paying the properly registered preferential rent. Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: