Google Search

TenantNet Forum Archives 1996-2002
Posting and Replies are disabled in all Archives
TenantNet Forum | TenantNet Forum Archives Index


Re: The doctrine of "illusory tenancy" is not new..here is some legal authority

Posted by James on September 06, 2000 at 12:31:39:

In Reply to: The doctrine of posted by hawk on September 05, 2000 at 21:22:00:

The only problem is putting this into action. It take quite a bit of money to retain a lawyer to file an action in civil court, and depending on how desireable the apartment is the prime tenent could fight tooth and nail for it. And if the subtenet loses you can bet that they won't be allowed to remain the that apartment for long, and they will also be liable for legal fees if they don't prevail. It sounds like a good idea on the surface, but leagal action almost always seems to end up being a protracted expensive affair. This type of advice appears to give hope to subletters that they can simply go and have an illusionary tenancy declared, I belive that it is possible, just not something that can be achieved in a easy, simple manner. (ie it is best pursued by the wealty who could afford market rents as it is)

Follow Ups:



Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:


   

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email      Full Name