Google Search

TenantNet Forum Archives 1996-2002
Posting and Replies are disabled in all Archives
TenantNet Forum | TenantNet Forum Archives Index

The doctrine of "illusory tenancy" is not is some legal authority

Posted by hawk on August 29, 2000 at 08:34:30:

In Reply to: TenantNet - Have you ever heard of ... posted by MikeW on August 28, 2000 at 12:28:24:

Because of several comments on this board about an apparent unawareness of the doctrine of illusory tenancy (see my posts of 8/6 and 8/10) here is some legal authority explaining the doctrine: "sub-tenant wins stabilized lease under doctrine of illusory tenancy" Greer v. Erwin, New York Law Journal, Sept. 22, 1993, page 22, col. 6 and "Illusory Tenancy, or when is a tenant not really a tenant?" New York Law Journal, June 16, 1996, page 5.
As one court simply explained the doctrine: "when there is an illusory tenancy the owner will be required to recognize the actual occupant as the real tenant, disregarding the illusory tenant. The occupant is then entitled to a renewal lease in his or her own name at the lawful stabilized rent. The illusory prime tenant is then legally responsible for refunding all overcharges collected from the occupant." Conti v. Citrin, 505 N.Y.S.2d 481, 484 (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 1985). I hope this helps.

Follow Ups:

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:


TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email      Full Name