---

Posted by MJ on June 12, 2000 at 11:08:07:

In Reply to: Re: Rent Stabilized Leases Still Available? posted by Will on June 11, 2000 at 19:00:21:

Will wrote:

"The only way an apartment leaves stabilization no matter what it rents at is when the landlord files for de-stabilization after the first tenant to pay over $2000 vacates . . ."

Different MJ here from the original poster, wanting to get clarification on exactly what is required for a landlord to file for destabilization--I've read the 1993 amendment but had trouble following it.

If you're the first person to pay $2000 or more for a rent-stabilized apartment, the apartment will remain rent-stabilized until you vacate it? I've seen other posts here about what permits a landlord to apply for destabilization that made it sound like if you pay $2000 or more, regardless of whether you are the first tenant to do so or not, then the landlord can file for destabilization.

And how does the earning more than $250,000 for two calendar years figure into this? Is it that if you earn $250,000 two years in a row, then regardless of whether you were the first person to pay $2000 or more, the landlord could file for destabilization?

Or is the the landlord can apply for destabilization only if the current tenant has made more the $250,000 in the two preceding calandar years AND is paying more than $2000/is not the first tenant to pay $2000 or more? So that regardless of whether the $2000 rule applies to anyone who pays $2000 or more or just to the people after the first person to pay $2000 or more, if you haven't made $250,000 in the two preceding calendar years, then the landlord cannot apply for destabilization?

Thanks,
MJ

Follow Ups:

• Re: Help decoding 'high rent' deregulation, also RRRA97 Anna 06/12/00 (5)
  • Re: Help decoding 'high rent' deregulation, also RRRA97 MJ 06/12/00 (4)
    • Re: Help decoding 'high rent' deregulation, also RRRA97 Anna 06/12/00 (3)
      • Re: Help decoding 'high rent' deregulation, also RRRA97 MJ 06/13/00 (2)
        • Re: Help decoding 'high rent' deregulation, also RRRA97 Anna 06/15/00 (1)
          • Re: Help decoding 'high rent' deregulation, also RRRA97 MJ 06/19/00 (0)

---

Note: Posting is disabled in all archives
Post a Followup

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

Comments:
: Will wrote: 

: "The only way an apartment leaves stabilization no matter what it rents at is when the landlord files for de-stabilization after the first tenant to pay over $2000 vacates . . ."

: Different MJ here from the original poster, wanting to get clarification on exactly what is required for a landlord to file for destabilization--I've read the 1993 amendment but had trouble following it.

: If you're the first person to pay $2000 or more for a rent-stabilized apartment, the apartment will remain rent-stabilized until you vacate it? I've seen other posts here about what permits a landlord to apply for destabilization that made it sound like if you pay $2000 or more, regardless of whether you are the first tenant to do so or not, then the landlord can file for destabilization.

: And how does the earning more than $250,000 for two calendar years figure into this? Is it that if you earn $250,000 two years in a row, then regardless of whether you were the first person to pay $2000 or more, the landlord could file for destabilization?

: Or is the the landlord can apply for destabilization only if the current tenant has made more the $250,000 in the two preceding calandar years AND is paying more than $2000/is not the first tenant to pay $2000 or more? So that regardless of whether the $2000 rule applies to anyone who pays $2000 or more or just to the people after the first person to pay $2000 or more, if you haven't made $250,000 in the two preceding calendar years, then the landlord cannot apply for destabilization?

: Thanks,
: MJ


Optional Link URL:  
Link Title:         
Optional Image URL: 

---