DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions






          GC 610090-RO
                                    STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433



          ----------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                               DOCKET NO.:   
                                                  GC 610090-RO             
                                                  RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
               RALPH LANGSAM ASSOCIATES,          DOCKET NO.:
                                                  EA 610563-S    
                                                  PREMISES: 
                                                  2446 University Ave.,
                                   PETITIONER     Apt. 5-E., Bronx, NY  
          ----------------------------------x



            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


          The above-named owner filed a timely petition for administrative 
          review of an order issued concerning the housing accommodations 
          relating to the above described docket number.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issues raised by the petition.

          The tenant commenced the proceeding below by filing a complaint 
          asserting that the owner had failed to maintain certain services in 
          the subject apartment, including but not limited to, mildew apart- 
          ment wide.

          In his answer the owner stated that services are being maintained 
          and that his painters had washed the walls with bleach and then 
          painted at the subject premises.

          Thereafter an inspection of the subject building was conducted by 
          a Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) inspector who 
          confirmed the existence of mildew apartment wide.

          The Rent Administrator directed restoration of these services and 
          further ordered, a reduction of the stabilization rent.

          In his petition for administrative review, the owner states that 
          all repairs had been completed as stated in his answer below.

          The tenant interposed an answer to the owner's petition for 
          administrative review which stated that the mildew has returned, 
          that the bathroom was recently painted but the mildew will return.











          GC 610090-RO



          The owner replied to the tenant's answer and stated that the tenant 
          agreed that the painters washed down the walls and painted where 
          there was a problem with mildew, however, the tenant should file a 
          new complaint when there is a new problem.

          After careful review of the evidence in the record, the Commis- 
          sioner is of the opinion that the petition should be denied.

          The owner's statement that the apartment walls were washed down and 
          painted and that the tenant should file a new complaint when there 
          is a new problem is not an adequate defense.  Clearly, the owner 
          did not effectuate complete and workmanlike repairs to correct the 
          problem and its underlying cause.

          Accordingly, based on a preponderance of the evidence, the Commis- 
          sioner finds that the owner has offered insufficient reason to 
          disturb the Administrator's determination on the entire record, 
          including the results of the on-site inspection conducted in the 
          subject apartment.

          This Order and Opinion is issued without prejudice to the owner's 
          rights as they may pertain to an application to the Division for a 
          restoration of rent based upon the restoration of services, if the 
          facts so warrant.


          THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, 
          it is,

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and 
          that the District Rent Administrator's order be, and the same 
          hereby is, affirmed.


          ISSUED:



                                                                           
                                                JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                Acting Deputy Commissioner
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: