DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions





                        STATE OF NEW YORK
            DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                  OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                           GERTZ PLAZA
                     92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                     JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

-----------------------------------X 
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE      ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
APPEAL OF                                DOCKET NO.:FB410058RO     
                                              
Joseph Kizner,                           RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                         DOCKET NO.:EE420023OR/    
                                                    EE420024OR
     
                                         SUBJECT PREMISES:
                                            121 Madison Avenue
                                            Apt. 9F
                                            New York, NY    
                      PETITIONER     
-----------------------------------X                           
              

            ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN 
                         PART AND MODIFYING ADMINISTRATOR'S ORDER

            The above-named owner filed a timely petition for administrative 
            review of two orders under Docket Nos. EE420023OR and EE420024OR
            issued on the same day of January 17, 1991 concerning the housing 
            accommodations relating to the above-described docket number, 
            wherein the Administrator granted partially the owner's rent 
            restoration applications.  

            The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and has 
            carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
            issues raised by the petition.

            A search of the record reveals that the subject apartment is rent- 
            controlled, a fact undisputed by the parties.

            The Administrator's order under Docket No. EE420023OR states that an 
            inspection held on December 28, 1990 revealed, in relevant part, 
            "evidence of peeling paint and plaster to living room walls         
             and ceiling." The order further states that the owner may refile   
            for the remaining $3.00 when all services are fully restored.

            The Administrator's order under Docket No. EE420024OR states that an 
            inspection held on December 28, 1990 revealed, in relevant part, 
            "evidence of peeling paint and plaster on living room walls and 
            ceiling with falling plaster"; and that the owner may refile for the 
            remaining $10.00 when all services are fully restored.


            FB410058RO

            In the petition for administrative review, the owner questions the 
            statement in the Administrator's order under Docket No.EE420023OR 
            that the "owner may refile for the remaining $3.00" when the peeling 
            paint and plaster to the living room walls and ceiling is corrected, 






            when another order (EE420024OR) issued on the same day based on the 
            same December 28, 1990 inspection states that the "owner may refile 
            for the remaining $10.00" for the same defective conditions.

            The Commissioner finds that as to the peeling paint and plaster to 
            the living room walls and ceiling, the Administrator's order under 
            Docket No. EE420024OR is duplicative and moot. The reference to 
            owner refiling for the remaining $10.00 is therefore deleted.

            Accordingly, the Administrator's order under Docket No. EE420023OR 
            is correct. The owner may refile for the remaining $3.00 when the 
            peeling paint and plaster to living room walls and ceiling is 
            removed.

            Thus, the owner's petition is granted in part and the
            Administrator's order under Docket No. EE420024OR modified in 
            accordance with this Order and Opinion.

            The owner may apply for another rent restoration application if the 
            facts so warrant.

            Rent arrears may be due the owner from the tenant as a result of 
            this Order and Opinion. Any arrears shall be paid in monthly 
            installments which shall not exceed the amount of the monthly rent 
            reductions revoked herein.  

            THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent and Eviction Regulations and 
            Operational Bulletin 84-1, it is

            ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, granted in 
            part, and that the Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, 
            modified in accordaance with this Order and Opinion.



            ISSUED:




                                                                          
                                                  JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                  Deputy Commissioner


    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: