DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions



          DOCKET NO.:  FB230323RO
                             STATE OF NEW YORK
                    DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                          OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                   GERTZ PLAZA
                             92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                             JAMAICA, NEW YORK  11433





     --------------------------------------X
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE   :   ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                                 DOCKET NO. FB230323RO
                                           :   DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR'S
               ABDURRAB KHAN,                  DOCKET NO. DL220006BO
                                           :              (BL224154BR)
                            PETITIONER     
     --------------------------------------X

          
           ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW

     The above-named owner filed a timely petition for administrative review of 
     an order issued concerning the housing accommodations known as 236 
     Montgomery Street, Apts. 3C - F, Brooklyn, NY.

     The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and has 
     carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the issues 
     raised by the petition.

     The issue before the Commissioner is whether the Administrator's order was 
     correct.

     The Administrator's order being appealed, DL220006BO was issued on January 
     25, 1991.  In that order, the Administrator affirmed the finding of 
     BL224154BR, issued November 10, 1989, that the owner be denied eligibility 
     for a 1988/89 Maximum Base Rent (MBR) increase, due to the owner's failure 
     to meet the violation certification requirement necessary to the owner's 
     being granted an MBR increase, specifically the owner's failure to clear 
     all rent impairing violations of record at the subject premises.

     On appeal the owner contends that the violations have been repaired.  In 
     support of this contention the owner submits with the appeal copies of 
     cancelled checks allegedly representing payment to repairmen.  The owner 
     also submits on appeal letters from the occupants of various apartments, 
     testifying to repair of specific violations within their apartments.

     The Commissioner is of the opinion that this petition should be denied.

     Section 2202.3(h) states that, in order for an owner to gain eligibility 
     to raise MBRs at a certain premises that owner must certify to the DHCR 
     that all rent impairing violations at that premises of record as of one 
     year before the effective date of the order of eligibility have been 
     cleared as of six months before the effective date.  In the instant case, 
     the owner had to certify that all rent impairing violations of record as 
     of January 1, 1987 had been cleared as of July 1, 1987.










          DOCKET NO.:  FB230323RO

     An inspection, conducted by the New York City Department of Housing 
     Preservation and Development (HPD) on October 10, 1990 disclosed that a 
     rent impairing violation first reported on January 7, 1986 (HPD# 499, Apt. 
     4B) had not yet been repaired.  The owner included with his appeal a 
     letter from the occupants of Apt. 4B stating that violation# 449 had been 
     repaired.  The undated letter was stamped as received by the DHCR on 
     February 28, 1991, with the rest of the owner's appeal.

     The Commissioner is of the opinion that the interpretation of this letter 
     that would be most favorable to the owner would merely confirm that rent 
     impairing violation #449 had been repaired sometime between October 10, 
     1990 and February 28, 1991 - approximately three years after the January 
     1, 1988 effective date of the order of eligibility.  The Commissioner is 
     therefore of the opinion that the Administrator was correct in finding 
     that the owner had not cleared all rent impairing violations from the 
     subject premises, and that the owner should thus be denied eligibility to 
     raise MBRs at the subject premises.

     THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the Rent and Eviction 
     Regulations, it is 

     ORDERED, that this petition for administrative review be, and the same 
     hereby is, denied, and that the order of the Rent Administrator be, and 
     the same hereby is, affirmed.

     ISSUED:


                                                                               
                                                     JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                     Deputy Commissioner
      
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: