DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          Docket Number: FB-110142-RO
                                 STATE OF NEW YORK
                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                    GERTZ PLAZA
                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

     ------------------------------------X 
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO.: FB 110142-RO
                                         :  
          ROTHSCHILD REALTY,                DRO DOCKET NO.: DI 110135-S

                           PETITIONER    : 
     ------------------------------------X                           
       
           ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW

     On  February  14,  1991,  the  above-named  owner  filed  a  Petition  For
     Administrative Review against an order issued on January 7, 1991,  by  the
     Rent Administrator of the Gertz  Plaza,  Jamaica,  District  Rent  Office,
     concerning the housing accommodations known as Apt. No. C-8,  144-06  88th
     Avenue, Jamaica, New York.

     The administrative appeal is being determined pursuant to  the  provisions
     of 2520.6(r) and 2523.4 of the Rent Stabilization Code.

     The issue herein is whether there was a decrease in  services,  warranting
     reduction of the legal regulated rent.

     The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the  record  and  has
     carefully considered that portion of the  record  relevant  to  the  issue
     raised by the administrative appeal.

     On September 5, 1989 the tenant filed a complaint of decrease of services, 
     alleging:

               "1.  The freezer compartment in the refrigerator has
                    fallen down.  Two pieces of pipe are holding it up.

                2.  The oven in the kitchen stove doesn't work.

                3.  The kitchen floor has holes in it especially under
                    the sink allowing mice, etc. to come into the
                    kitchen."



     In its answer dated October 10, 1989, the owner denied the allegations set 
     forth in the tenant's complaint or otherwise asserted  that  all  required
     repair had been or will be completed.

     On November  5,  1990,  a  physical  inspection  of  the  subject  housing
     accommodation was conducted by the D.H.C.R.  The inspector  reported  that
     there is evidence of vermin infestation in the kitchen.



     On January 7, 1991, the Rent Administrator issued an order  based  on  the
     report of the physical inspection, reducing the legal regulated  rent  and






          Docket Number: FB-110142-RO
     directing restoration of service.

     In this petition, the owner states in substance  that  repairs  have  been
     performed; that the tenant caused the delay in repairs by refusing access; 
     and that the  inspector's  finding  is  not  what  the  tenant  originally
     complained-of.

     The Commissioner is of the opinion that this petition should be denied.

     Despite the owner's assertions, the physical inspection  report  disclosed
     that the complained-of conditions existed.  The  Commissioner  thus  finds
     that the rent reduction is warranted.

     Contrary to the owner's  allegations,  the  Commissioner  notes  that  the
     inspector's finding of vermin infestation confirmed the tenant's  original
     complaint that "the kitchen floor has holes in  it  especially  under  the
     sink allowing mice, etc. to come into the kitchen."

     As to the owner's allegation of tenant refusing access,  the  Commissioner
     notes that this defense was never asserted  by  the  owner  prior  to  the
     issuance of the Rent Administrator's Order and was only first raised as  a
     self-serving  and  unproven  assertion  on   appeal.    Accordingly,   the
     Commissioner will not entertain this defense by the owner.

     THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, it is

     ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied,  and  that
     the Rent Administrator's Order be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

     ISSUED:




                                                                   
                                     ELLIOT SANDER
                                     Deputy Commissioner




                                                   
      
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: