DHCR Decisions
Docket Number: FE 110222-RO
STATE OF NEW YORK
DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
GERTZ PLAZA
92-31 UNION HALL STREET
JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433
-----------------------------------X
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
APPEAL OF DOCKET NO.: FE 110222-RO
DISTRICT RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
BERTA WEITZ, DOCKET NO.: EE 110016-S
SUBJECT PREMISES:
120-08 97th Ave., Apt. No. 7D
PETITIONER Richmond Hill, NY 11419
-----------------------------------X
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
The above-named owner filed a timely petition for administrative
review of an order issued on October 16, 1990, concerning the
housing accommodations relating to the above-described docket
number.
This administrative appeal is being determined pursuant to the
provisions of 9 NYCRR 2520.6(r) and 9 NYCRR 2523.4.
The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and has
carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the
issues raised by the petition.
The original proceeding was commenced on May 4, 1990 by the tenant
filing a complaint asserting that the owner had failed to maintain
certain services in the subject apartment.
In its answer filed on May 23, 1990, the owner denied the allega
tions set forth in the tenant's complaint and otherwise asserted
that required repairs had been performed and will be completed.
Thereafter on July 16, 1990, the subject apartment was inspected by
a D.H.C.R. inspector which confirmed the existence of defective
conditions.
The Administrator directed on October 16, 1990 restoration of these
services and further ordered reduction of the stabilized rent.
In this petition, the owner states in substance that the required
repairs had been performed.
After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion that
the petition should be denied.
The owner's petition does not make clear whether it is the owner's
contention that repairs had been made before the apartment was
inspected or the order was issued, or whether the contention is that
repairs were made following the issuance of the Administrator's
order. If it is the former, then the owner's allegation is belied
Docket Number: FE 110222-RO
by the report of the agency inspector. If it is the latter, then
the Administrator's order reducing the rent was nevertheless correct
when issued, and this order is issued without prejudice to the owner
filing an application for restoration of services.
THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code,
it is
ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and
that the District Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby
is, affirmed.
ISSUED:
ELLIOT SANDER
Deputy Commissioner
|
|
|