DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions








          FC 220032-RO
           

                                  STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433



          ----------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEALS OF                              DOCKET NO.:   
                                                  FC 220032-RO                
                  TRUMP MANAGEMENT INC.,          
                                                  RENT          ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                  DOCKET NO.: 
                                  PETITIONER      ZDK 220487-S
          ----------------------------------x


            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW   
                                          

          On March 4, 1991, the above-named  owner  filed  a  petition  for
          administrative review of an order issued on February 7, 1991,  by
          a Rent Administrator concerning the housing  accommodation  known
          as Apartment 4-D at  2036  Cropsey  Avenue,  Brooklyn,  New  York
          wherein the  Administrator  found  a  decrease  in  services  and
          ordered a reduction in the maximum legal rent.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all of evidence in the  record  and
          has carefully considered that  portion  relevant  to  the  issues
          raised by the administrative appeal.

          On November 21, 1987 the tenant filed a complaint of decrease  in
          services,  alleging  that  his  30-year  old  kitchen  floor  was
          cracked, and that a recent paint job was deficient.

          The owner, in answer,  contended  that  the  tenant's  floor,  on
          examination, was too dirty to determine whether  there  were  any
          worn or broken tiles.

          On January 28, 1991 a physical inspection of t e  subject  apart-
          ment was carried out by the Division  of  Housing  and  Community
          Renewal (DHCR).  The inspector, in his report, noted that several 
          kitchen floor tiles were cracked and that  the  bathroom  ceiling
          and walls had evidence of peeling paint and plaster.


          On February 7, 1991, the Rent Administrator issued the order here 
          under review, finding that a diminution of services had  occurred
          and reducing the tenant's rents by $9.50, representi g  a  reduc-
          tion of $4.50 for the cracked kitchen floor tiles, and $5.00  for
          peeling paint and plaster.

          In its petition for administrative  review,  the  owner  contends
          that the subject apartment is not  rent  controlled,  and  states
          that the issue was decided under DHCR  Order  No.  ZCD  210213-S,







          FC 220032-RO
          issued July 27, 1989.

          After careful consideration the Commissioner is  of  the  opinion
          that this petition should be denied.

          The Commissioner finds that the  allegations  of  the  petitioner
          regarding the apartment's status, and regarding DHCR Docket No.
          ZCD 210213-S, are  incorrect.   DHCR  records  confirm  that  the
          subject apartment is rent controlled and the cited Docket No. ZCD 
          210213-S concerns another building.

          The Commissioner finds no basis to modify the District Rent 
          Administrator's order.

          This Order and Opinion is issued without prejudice to the owner's 
          right to file an application with the Division for a  restoration
          of rent based upon the restoration of services, if warranted.


          THEREFORE, in accordance with the New York City Rent and Eviction 
          Regulations, it is,

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same  hereby  is,  denied
          and that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the  same  hereby
          is, affirmed.


          ISSUED:



                                                                           
                                                ELLIOT SANDER
                                                Deputy Commissioner


                                          
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: