DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          DC110434RO





                                    STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433





          ----------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                               DOCKET NO.:             
                                                  DC110434RO
                   LEONEDAS REALTY,   
                                                  RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                  DOCKET NO.:
          ----------------------------------x     BB110488S 



            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


          On March 21, 1989, the above-named petitioner-owner timely refiled 
          a petition for administrative review (PAR) of an order issued on 
          September 14, 1987, by the Rent Administrator, concerning the 
          housing accommodation known as 103-19 68th Road, Apartment 4-L, 
          Forest Hills, New York, wherein the Rent Administrator determined 
          that the dishwasher is a required service and directed the owner to 
          repair same.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issue raised by the administrative appeal.  

          The proceeding was commenced with the filing of a complaint of a 
          decrease in services dated February 15, 1987, stating that the 
          owner had refused to service the dishwasher which was in the 
          apartment when the tenant moved in in 1975.  A copy of the tenant's 
          complaint was served on the owner on March 24, 1987, who responded 
          with a request for additional time to answer.  The record does not 
          contain the owner's answer to the complaint, if one was filed.  

          Thereafter an inspection conducted by a Division employee verified 
          that the dishwasher was not working.  

          On September 14, 1987 the Administrator issued its order directing 
          the owner to restore the service.  The order did not direct a rent 
          reduction.












                    






          In the petition for administrative review, the owner states that 
          the dishwasher was not provided by the owner, but was installed by 
          the tenant in violation of the lease and is not a required service.
          In support of its position, the owner submitted a copy of the lease 
          covering the period January 1, 1986 to December 31, 1987 which, in 
          relevant part, prohibits the tenant from installing a dishwasher.  
          Also submitted was a copy of the initial registration on which are 
          checked a stove and refrigerator only as equipment included with 
          the apartment.  The lease and registration were also submitted by 
          the owner in a compliance proceeding commenced after the Adminis- 
          trator's order was issued.

          After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion 
          that the petition should be denied.

          The owner submitted no evidence below to support its position that 
          the tenant installed the appliance.  Appliances pre-existing in the 
          apartment which have been abandoned by prior tenants become the 
          property of the owner and therefore, apartment equipment, unless 
          ownership thereof is disavowed by the owner in the initial lease.  
          The tenant's initial lease was not made part of the record herein. 
          A later lease and other documents which were submitted with the 
          PAR, in addition to being irrelevant to the issue herein, are 
          outside the scope of review in this administrative appeal.

          THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, 
          and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, it is

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and 
          that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, 
          affirmed.


          ISSUED:




                                                                           
                                                JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                Deputy Commissioner




                  
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: