DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions



          DOCKET NO.:  DA420048RT
                              STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK  11433





     --------------------------------------X
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE   :   ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                                 DOCKET NO. DA420048RT
                                           :   DISTRICT ADMINISTRATOR'S
               RICHARD TRACHTMAN,              DOCKET NO. BL427972BR
                                           :             
                            PETITIONER     
     --------------------------------------X

          
            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW

     The above-named tenant filed a timely petition for administrative review of 
     an order issued concerning the housing accommodations known as 87 Barrow 
     Street, Apt. 5B, New York, NY.

     The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and has 
     carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the issues raised 
     by the petition.

     The issue before the Commissioner is whether the Administrator's order was 
     correct.

     The Administrator's order being appealed, BL427972BR was issued on November 
     14, 1988.  In that order, the Administrator found that the owner should be 
     granted eligibility for a 1988/89 Maximum Base Rent (MBR) increase.

     On appeal the tenant alleges that, as of the effective date of the order 
     being appealed herein (January 1, 1988), there was an order of rent reduction 
     outstanding against the subject premises.  As such, the tenant contends that 
     the Administrator was in error in granting the owner eligibility to raise 
     MBRs at the subject premises.  The order is dated January 5, 1987.

     The Commissioner is of the opinion that this petition should be denied.

     The fact that there is a previous rent-reducing order outstanding against a 
     premises does not bar the Administrator from granting eligibility to the 
     owner of the premises from raising MBRs at the premises; rather, it bars the 
     owner from collecting those rent increases from the subject tenant(s) until 
     the issuance of an order restoring rent at which time the increased rent is 
     collectible prospectively only.

     An examination of the record discloses that on November 9, 1989 the 
     Administrator issue an order of rent restoration under docket # DE420039OR.  
     The Commissioner is thus of the opinion that the owner is eligible to collect 
     increased rent, as of the December 1, 1989 rent payment only.










          DOCKET NO.:  DA420048RT

     THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the Rent and Eviction 
     Regulations, it is 

     ORDERED, that this petition for administrative review be, and the same hereby 
     is, denied, and that the order of the Rent Administrator be, and the same 
     hereby is, affirmed.  

     The owner is directed to refund to the tenant those portions of all rent 
     payments made by the tenant from January 1, 1988 through November 1, 1988 
     inclusive representing increase in the 1988/89 MBR.  This refund is to be 
     made in a single lump sum, within thirty (30) days from the date of this 
     Order.

     ISSUED:


                                                                               
                                                     JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                     Deputy Commissioner
      
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: