DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          DC220196RO


                                  STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433





          ----------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                               DOCKET NO.:
                                                  DC220196RO
                  ZOILA LUCINDA AVILA,                                     
                                                  RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                  DOCKET NO.:
                                  PETITIONER      BK220004S 
          -----------------------------------x



            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


          On March 2, 1989, the above-named owner filed a timely petition for 
          administrative review against an order issued concerning the 
          housing accommodation known as 3443 Fulton Street, Brooklyn,   
          New York, Apartment 1-R.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issues raised in this petition. 

          The tenant commenced the proceeding below on November 5, 1987 by 
          filing a complaint asserting that the owner had failed to maintain 
          certain required services.

          Although afforded an opportunity to do so, the owner did not 
          interpose an answer.

          Thereafter, on January 4, 1989, a staff inspector conducted an on 
          site inspection of the subject apartment and reported as follows:

               1.   Vermin infestation in the kitchen area,
               2.   Broken Mailbox,
               3.   Incomplete repairs to the large hole on the 
                    bathroom wall, and
               4.   Hole and water stains on the bedroom ceiling.














          DC220196RO



          Based thereon, the Rent Administrator, by order dated February 9, 
          1989, directed restoration of these services and further ordered a 
          reduction of the stabilized rent in an amount equal to the most 
          recent guideline adjustment.

          In the petition for administrative review, the owner asserts that 
          the tenant had refused the owner access.

          In answer to the petition, the tenant denies refusing access.

          After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion 
          that this petition should be denied.

          The petition does not establish any basis for modifying or revoking 
          the Administrator's order which determined that the owner was not 
          maintaining required services based on a physical inspection 
          confirming the existence of defective conditions for which a rent 
          reduction is warranted.

          The scope of review in an administrative appeal is limited to the 
          facts or evidence presented to the Administrator unless it can be 
          shown that the facts or evidence could not be presented.  In the 
          proceeding below, the owner failed to respond to the complaint.   
          Having defaulted, pursuant to Section 2529.6 of New York City's 
          Rent Stabilization Code, the Commissioner is not permitted to 
          consider the owner's arguments set forth in this appeal. 

          The owner may file a rent restoration application if the facts so 
          warrant. 

          The automatic stay of the retroactive rent abatement that resulted 
          by the filing of this petition is vacated upon issuance of this 
          Order and Opinion.  


          THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code 
          and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, it is ,

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and 
          that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, 
          affirmed.


          ISSUED:

                                                                         
                                                  JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                  Deputy Commissioner
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: