DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions









                                  STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433





          ----------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                               DOCKET NO.:
                                                  DC110420RO
             JAMAICA WOODS ASSOCIATES,                                
                                                  RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                  DOCKET NO.:
                                  PETITIONER      CB110280S 
          ----------------------------------x



            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


          The above-named owner filed a timely petition for administrative 
          review against an order issued on March 13, 1989 concerning the 
          housing accommodation known as Apt. 2-M located at 88-05 171st 
          Street, Jamaica, New York.  

          The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issues raised in this petition. 

          The tenant commenced this proceeding on February 22, 1988 by filing 
          a complaint asserting that the owner had failed to maintain certain 
          required services.

          The owner was served with a copy of the complaint and afforded an 
          opportunity to respond.  The owner failed to file a response.

          Thereafter, a physical inspection of the subject apartment was 
          conducted on  February 14, 1989.  The inspection revealed the 
          following:

                    1.   Water pressure in bathroom shower weak,

                    2.   Peeling paint and plaster throughout apartment,

                    3.   Cracked plaster throughout apartment,













          DC110420RO

          DC110420RO

                    4.   Evidence of vermin infestation,

                    5.   Defective intercom.

          Based thereon, the Rent Administrator's order directed restoration 
          of services and further ordered a reduction of the stabilized rent.

          In the petition for administrative review, the owner asserts that 
          all repairs were completed as of the time that it had notice of the 
          complaint, that it had no notice of the existence of these 
          conditions prior to the filing of the complaint and that it would 
          violate due process to impose a rent reduction for conditions whose 
          existence the owner was not made aware of. The petition was served 
          on the tenant on April 28, 1989.

          After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion 
          that this petition should be denied.

          The Commissioner notes that pursuant to Section 2523.4 of the Rent 
          Stabilization Code a tenant may apply to the DHCR for a rent 
          reduction based on the owner's failure to maintain required 
          services and the Administrator shall reduce the rent upon finding 
          that the owner has failed to maintain such services.  Pursuant to 
          Section 2520.6 (r) of the Code, the definition of required services 
          includes repairs and maintenance. This petition does not establish 
          any basis for modifying or revoking the Administrator's order which 
          determined that the owner was not maintaining required services 
          based on an on-site physical inspection confirming the existence of 
          defective conditions for which a rent reduction is warranted. 
          Service of the complaint on the owner on March 23, 1988 afforded 
          the owner sufficient notice and opportunity to correct the 
          conditions complained of before the order was issued almost a year 
          later. The order here under review is affirmed.

               The automatic stay of the retroactive rent abatement that
          resulted by the filing of this petition is vacated upon issuance of 
          this order and opinion. The owner may file a rent restoration 
          application if the facts so warrant. 

          THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code 
          and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, it is,
















          DC110420RO

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and 
          that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, 
          affirmed.

          ISSUED:

                                                                         
                                                  JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                  Deputy Commissioner






    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: