DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          CC430329RT
                                  STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                                  JAMAICA, NY 11433





          ------------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE          ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                                    DOCKET NO.: CC430329RT

                    Rosa Lacen-Baez,
                    Tenant Representative
                                                       RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                       DOCKET NO.: BG430145OR
                                   PETITIONER
          ------------------------------------x

            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW

          On or about March 24, 1988, the above-named petitioner-tenant filed 
          a petition for administrative review of an order issued on March 8, 
          1988 by the Rent Administrator, concerning the housing 
          accommodation known as 1 Arden Street, various apartments, New 
          York, N.Y., wherein the Administrator determined that the services, 
          which had been the subject of a previous rent reduction order, had 
          been restored and ordered a restoration of the rent.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issue raised by the administrative appeal.

          This proceeding was commenced by the filing by the owner of an 
          application to restore rent based upon a restoration of services.

          An inspection conducted by a DHCR staff inspector on December 31, 
          1987 revealed that the vestibule door is kept locked and secured 
          and the incinerator door had been repaired, resulting in the 
          Administrator's order of March 8, 1988 which found that services 
          had been restored and restored the rent effective October 1, 1987.

          In the PAR, the tenant representative states that the door was not 
          in working order until December 14, 1987 and objects to the 
          effective date of the order restoring the rent.

          After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion 
          that the petition should be denied.

          The report of inspection dated December 31, 1987, by an employee of 
          the Division who is not a party to the proceeding, was properly 












          CC430329RT


          placed in the record for consideration by the Administrator.  The 
          Commissioner finds that it was proper for the Administrator to 
          restore the rent based on the report of its inspector which found 
          that, as of the date of inspection, services had been restored.

          The Commissioner also finds that the Administrator correctly set 
          the effective date of the rent restoration.  Pursuant to Section 
          2202.2 of the Rent and Eviction Regulations, which pertain to the 
          rent controlled tenants affected by this order, no order granting 
          a rent restoration with respect to a rent controlled apartment 
          shall be effective prior to the date on which the order is issued.  
          Pursuant to the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, pertaining to the 
          rent stabilized tenants affected by the order, an order granting a 
          rent restoration is effective on the first day of the month 
          following service on the tenants of a copy of the owner's 
          application for such rent restoration.  Thus, the effective date of 
          the restoration was correctly determined by the Administrator for 
          both the rent controlled and the rent stabilized tenants.

          THEREFORE, in accordance with the City Rent Law, the Rent and 
          Eviction Regulations, and the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, 
          it is

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied and 
          the Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
                


          ISSUED:


                                                                     
                                             JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                             Deputy Commissioner  
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: