DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          CC420052RT





                                    STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433





          ----------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                               DOCKET NO.:             
                                                  CC420052RT
                   SHIRLEY STRAUCHLER,
                                                  RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                  DOCKET NO.:
          ----------------------------------x     BH410055OR



            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


          On March 8, 1988, the above-named petitioner-tenant filed a 
          petition for administrative review (PAR) of an order issued on 
          February 29, 1988, by the Rent Administrator, concerning the 
          housing accommodation known as 340 East 63rd Street. Apartment 2-A, 
          New York, New York, wherein the Rent Administrator determined that 
          the conditions, for which a rent reduction had been previously 
          granted on June 24, 1987, under Docket No. AJ430046B, had been 
          corrected and granted a restoration of the rent.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issue raised by the administrative appeal.  

          This proceeding was commenced by the filing of a complaint of 
          various applications to restore rent dated August 14, 1987.  

          On December 11, 1987, an inspection by a Division employee revealed 
          that the conditions, for which the rent had been reduced, had been 
          corrected and ordered a full restoration of the rent in the amount 
          of $5.00 per tenant.

          In the petition for administrative review, the tenant objects to 
          the rent restoration on the basis that she never received the 
          benefit of the rent reduction.














                    






          A copy of the tenant's PAR was served on the owner who responded 
          saying that the tenant's rent will not be raised $5.00 because it 
          had never been reduced.  The owner states that it never knew the 
          rent reduction was in effect despite inquiry with this Division.

          After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion 
          that the petition should be denied.

          The Administrator's order is correct as issued.  The order does not 
          grant the owner an increase in the rent it may charge.  It merely 
          restores the rent in the same amount as was to have been reduced. 

          The owner is cautioned that the tenant is still entitled to a 
          credit of $5.00 per month for the period that the rent reduction 
          was in effect, even though the parties agree that the rent being 
          charged, at the time the PAR was filed, already includes the 
          restored amount.                      


          THEREFORE, in accordance with the City Rent Law and the Rent and 
          Eviction Regulations, it is

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and 
          that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, 
          affirmed.


          ISSUED:




                                                                           
                                                JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                                Deputy Commissioner




    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: