DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions








                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA

                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

          ------------------------------------X   ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     DOCKET NO.: CB430201RT
          APPEAL OF
                   VARIOUS TENANTS OF 345
                   RIVERSIDE DRIVE,
                                                  RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                               PETITIONERS        DOCKET NO.: AJ410166OM 
          ------------------------------------X

                  ORDER AND OPINION TERMINATING PROCEEDING AS MOOT

          On February 9, 1988, the above-named petitioner-tenants filed a 
          petition for administrative review (PAR) of an order issued on 
          January 5, 1988, by the Rent Administrator, concerning the housing 
          accommodations known as 345 Riverside Drive A.K.A. 320 West 107th 
          Street, New York, NY, various apartments, wherein the Administrator
          granted the owner's application for a rent increase which was based 
          on the installation of various major capital improvements (MCIs).
           
          The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issue raised by the administrative appeal.

          The owner commenced the instant proceeding by initially filing an 
          application for a rent increase predicated on the installation of 
          a sidewalk, oil burner/boiler, roof, elevator repairs, compactor 
          and copper piping at a total claimed cost of $164,950.00.

          In Docket No. AJ410166OM, issued January 5, 1988, the Rent 
          Administrator partially approved the owner's MCI application by 
          authorizing a rent increase of $12.92 per room, per month, for all 
          rent controlled and rent stabilized apartments in the subject 
          building predicated on the installation of an oil burner/boiler , 
          roof, compactor and copper piping, which work was found to qualify 
          as an MCI.

          The Commissioner notes that the Rent Administrator reopened the 
          proceeding under Docket No. CE410004RP, reprocessed the owner's 
          application and then issued an order on October 3, 1989, modifying 
          Docket No. AJ410166OM by disallowing the cost of the boiler/burner 
          in response to tenant complaints, and in  so doing, granted the 
          relief requested in this petition.

          In view of the foregoing, the Commissioner is of the opinion that 
          ADMIN. REVIEW DOCKET NO. CB430201RT













          the tenants' administrative appeal against the original decision of 
          the Administrator under Docket No. CB430201RT should be terminated 
          as moot.  Any aggrieved party had the right to timely file an 
          administrative appeal against the order issued under Docket No. 
          CE410004RP within 35 days of its issuance and the Division's 
          records reveal that such a PAR was filed by the tenants and is 
          awaiting determination (Docket No. DK410121RT).

          THEREFORE, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Rent 
          Stabilization Law and Code and the Rent Eviction Regulations for 
          New York City, it is

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, terminated 
          as moot. 



          ISSUED:




                                                                          
                                                  LULA M. ANDERSON  
                                                  Deputy Commissioner





    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: