DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          CB110364RO
                                  STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                                  JAMAICA, NY 11433





          ------------------------------------x
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE          ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                                    DOCKET NO.: CB110364RO

                    Ron Lazarus
                    Jackson 34 Associates,
                                                       RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
                                                       DOCKET NO.: BG110161S
                                   PETITIONER
          ------------------------------------x

            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW

          The above-named petitioner-owner filed a timely petition for 
          administrative review of an order issued concerning the housing 
          accommodation known as 86-10 34th Avenue, Apartment 215, 
          Jackson Heights, New York.

          The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record and 
          has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to the 
          issues raised by the petition.

          The tenant commenced the proceeding below by filing a complaint on 
          July 7, 1987, asserting that the owner had failed to maintain 
          certain services in the subject apartment such as a leaking hot 
          water faucet and a defective shower pan that causes flooding in the 
          apartment below.

          In an answer, the owner asserted that all required repairs had been 
          completed upon receipt of the complaint.  The owner also states 
          that on September 11, 1987, he visited the tenant's apartment, saw 
          that the work was completed and that the tenant was satisfied with 
          the repairs.

          Thereafter an inspection of the subject apartment was conducted by 
          a DHCR inspector on December 15, 1987 who confirmed the existence 
          of the following defective conditions:

               1.   Kitchen sink hot water faucet leaks.
               2.   Bedroom ceiling is blistered from water seepage.

          The Rent Administrator directed restoration of these services and 
          further ordered, a reduction of the stabilization rent.












          CB110364RO


          In its petition for administrative review, the owner states, in 
          substance, that the kitchen faucet has been replaced, the entire 
          apartment has been painted, and that an answer was sent to the DHCR 
          stating that all work has been completed and personally inspected.  
           
          The DHCR served a copy of the petition on the tenant on May 13, 
          1988.

          After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the opinion 
          that the petition should be denied.

          Pursuant to Section 2523.4 of the Rent Stabilization Code, DHCR is 
          required to order a rent reduction, upon application by a tenant, 
          where it is found that an owner has failed to maintain required 
          services.  The owner's petition does not establish any basis for 
          modifying or revoking the Administrator's order which determined 
          that the owner was not maintaining  required services based on a 
          physical inspection confirming the existence of defective 
          conditions in the subject apartment for which a rent reduction is 
          warranted.

          The Administrator's order was properly based on the on-site 
          inspection on December 15, 1987 which confirmed the existence of a 
          kitchen sink hot water faucet that leaks and bedroom ceiling that 
          is blistered from water seepage.  Accordingly, the determination 
          was in all respects proper, and is hereby sustained.

          The Division's records reveal that the owner's rent restoration 
          application was granted (Docket No. HH110060OR). 

          THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code 
          and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, it is

          ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and 
          that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, 
          affirmed. 


          ISSUED:




                                                                     
                                             JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                             Deputy Commissioner  
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: