DHCR Decisions
CA410366RO
STATE OF NEW YORK
DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
GERTZ PLAZA
92-31 UNION HALL STREET
JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433
----------------------------------x
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
APPEAL OF DOCKET NO.: CA410366RO
RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
TRILBY HOLDING CORP. DOCKET NO.: BG410017S,
BG410075S
PETITIONER
----------------------------------x
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
The above-named owner filed a timely petition for
administrative review of an order issued concerning the housing
accommodation known as 152 West 49 St., Apt. 3E, New York, NY.
The Commissioner has reviewed all the evidence in the record
and has carefully considered that portion of the record relevant to
the issues raised by the petition.
The tenant commenced the proceeding below by filing a
complaint asserting that the owner had failed to maintain certain
services in the subject apartment.
The owner did not interpose an answer to the tenant's
complaint after DHCR served a copy of the complaint on the owner on
July 23, 1987.
Thereafter an inspection of the subject apartment was
conducted by a D.H.C.R inspector who confirmed the existence of the
following defective conditions: water damaged closet is peeling
paint and plaster; inadequate cold water pressure at bathroom sink
and bathtub; two livingroom windows, two bedroom windows and one
bathroom window have loose panes and require caulking.
The Rent Administrator directed restoration of these services
and further ordered a reduction of the stabilization rent.
In the petition for administrative review, the owner states,
in substance, that all violations have been corrected.
The DHCR served a copy of the petition on the tenant on April
21, 1988.
CA410366RO
After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the
opinion that the petition should be denied.
Pursuant to Section 2523.4 of the Rent Stabilization Code,
DHCR is required to order the rent reduction, upon application by
the tenant, where it is found that the owner has failed to maintain
required services. The owner's petition does not establish any
basis for modifying or revoking the Administrator's order which
determined that the owner was not maintaining required services
based on a physical inspection confirming the existence of
defective conditions in the subject apartment for which a rent
reduction is warranted.
The owner may file a rent restoration application if the facts
so warrant.
The automatic stay of the retroactive rent abatement that
resulted by the filing of this petition is vacated upon issuance of
this order and opinion.
THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and
Code and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974, it is,
ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is,
denied, and that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same
hereby is, affirmed.
ISSUED:
___________________
Joseph A. D'Agosta
Deputy Commissioner
|