DHCR Decisions
ADM. REVIEW DOCKET NOS. BE420103RT, BE430032RT AND BJ420232RT
STATE OF NEW YORK
DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
GERTZ PLAZA
92-31 UNION HALL STREET
JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433
------------------------------------X
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
APPEALS OF DOCKET NOS. BE420103RT,
BE430032RT and BJ420232RT
MARIA RAMIREZ, MARIA GONZALEZ, DISTRICT RENT
AND RICHARD BURKE, ADMINISTRATOR'S DOCKET
NO. AC420001RR
PETITIONERS
------------------------------------X
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
In May, 1987 the above-named tenants filed petitions for
administrative review of an order issued on April 29, 1987 by the
Administrator concerning various housing accommodations in the
premises known as 122-126 West 83rd Street, New York, New York.
Since the petitions involve common questions of law and fact,
the Commissioner deems it appropriate to consolidate the
proceedings for disposition herein.
The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the
record and has carefully considered that portion of the record
relevant to the issues raised by the petitions for review.
This proceeding was commenced by the filing of a "Landlord's
Application For Modification of Maximum Collectible Rent" for the
subject apartments pursuant to former Section 33.9 of the City
Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations (now under Section
2202.12 of the City Rent and Eviction Regulations).
In the above-mentioned application the subject landlord
affirmed, on March 12, 1986, the following:
ADM. REVIEW DOCKET NOS. BE420103RT, BE430032RT AND BJ420232RT
An increase in rents in the
above premises is requested based
upon increased maintenance
and operation costs and the
payment of debt service. This
property has been rehabilitated
and was financed by a Municipal
Loan under Article VIII of
the Private Housing Finance
Law....
Also in the above-mentioned application the Department of
Housing Preservation and Development (HPD)-Office of Development
certified, on March 18, 1986, that:
[T]he increased rent applied for is
the minimum necessary for the continued
financial survival of these premises
as contemplated under Article VIII
of the Private Housing Finance Law.
A breakdown of costs and approved
financial justification report has
been submitted to the District
Rent Office.
In the order under review herein, the Administrator granted
the subject landlord's application, and increased the maximum rents
of the subject apartments, pursuant to the former Section 33.9 of
the City Rent, Eviction, and Rehabilitation Regulations.
The subject tenants allege that they are senior citizens; that
the maximum rent increases are substantial, and that two of the
tenants assert that they live on a fixed income, and that they can
not afford to pay the increase in their maximum rent.
After careful consideration, the Commissioner is of the
opinion that the subject tenants' petitions should be denied.
Section 2202.12 of the City Rent and Eviction Regulations
provides as follows:
The administrator may grant an
appropriate adjustment where he
ADM. REVIEW DOCKET NOS. BE420103RT, BE430032RT AND BJ420232RT
finds that there has been a
rehabilitation or improvement of
substandard or deteriorated housing
accommodations which has been
financed under a governmental
program providing assistance
through loans, loan insurance
or tax abatement, or which
has been undertaken under any
other rehabilitation program
not so financed but approved
by the administrator.
The Commissioner finds that the subject landlord has met the
requirements for maximum rent increases in the subject building
pursuant to the above-mentioned regulation.
The Commissioner takes note of the fact that increases in the
maximum rents of senior citizens living on a fixed income may cause
financial hardships on them. However, the Commissioner is
constrained to affirm the Administrator's order pursuant to the
aforementioned rent regulation.
Accordingly, the Commissioner finds that the tenants'
petitions should be denied.
THEREFORE, in accordance with the City Rent and Rehabilitation
Law and the Rent and Eviction Regulations, it is
ORDERED, that these petitions be, and the same hereby are,
denied, and that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same
hereby is, affirmed.
ISSUED:
JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
Deputy Commissioner
|