DHCR Decisions                              STATE OF NEW YORK                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION                                    GERTZ PLAZA                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK  11433     --------------------------------------X     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE   :       APPEAL OF                                 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW                                           :   DOCKET NO. BD 120073-RT           RAFFEALLA INCANTALUPO,              DISTRICT RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S                                           :   DOCKET NO. 7MBC25Q (7MO2380-Q)                            PETITIONER             --------------------------------------X                        ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW     On April 7, 1987, the above-named tenant filed a petition for administrative     review  of an order issued on April 3, 1987 by a District Rent Administrator     concerning the housing accommodations known as the Top Floor Apartment, 10-     31 51st Avenue, Long Island City, New York.     The Administrator in the order under review herein, determined that the     subject tenant did not file a timely challenge of the 1986-1987 MBR order of     eligibility under Docket No. 7M02380-Q, issued on September 10, 1986.     Accordingly, the Commissioner finds that the only issue to be determined in     this proceeding is whether the subject tenant filed a timely challenge of     the rent agency's order under Docket No. 7MO2380-Q.     The Commissioner finds that the subject tenant's petition did not establish     that her challenge to the above-mentioned order (1986-1987 MBR order of     eligibility) was timely filed.  The Commissioner further finds that the     tenant's petition does not even raise the issue of the timeliness of the     filing of the above-mentioned challenge.     As the record reflects that the tenant did not file a timely challenge to     the 1986-1987 MBR order of eligibility, the Commissioner finds that there is     no issue to be determined by the Commissioner in this proceeding, and that     the tenant's petition should be denied.     Accordingly, the Commissioner finds that the Administrator's order should     not be disturbed.     THEREFORE, in accordance with the City Rent and Rehabilitation Law and the     Rent and Eviction Regulations, it is           DOCKET NO.:  BD 120073-RT     ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied, and that the     Administrator's order, under Docket No. 7MBC25Q (7MO2380-Q), be, and the     same hereby is, affirmed.     ISSUED:                                                                                                                                    JOSEPH D'AGOSTA                                                 Acting Deputy Commissioner     Note:  This order is being issued without prejudice to the rights of any of     the parties arising out of future determinations by the rent agency.