DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          ADM. REVIEW DOCKET NO.: BH - 110269 RO

                                  STATE OF NEW YORK
                      DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                            OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                     GERTZ PLAZA
                               92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                               JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

          ------------------------------------X 
          IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
          APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO.:               
                                                 BH 110269 RO
                                              :
                                                 RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S    
                                                 DOCKET NO.:            
                                                 BB 110080 S
                SUN MANAGEMENT                    

                              PETITIONER      : 
          ------------------------------------X                             

            ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


               On August 22, 1987, the above named petitioner-owner filed a 
          Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) against an order issued on 
          July 20, 1987, by the Rent Administrator at Gertz Plaza, Jamaica, 
          New York, concerning the housing accommodations known as 41-41 41st 
          Street, Apartment 1D, Queens, New York, wherein the Administrator 
          determined the tenant's complaint of decreased services commenced 
          on February 9, 1987.

               The challenged order decreased the tenant's rent based on the 
          results of an inspection held on March 9, 1987 that confirmed 
          several claims of decreased services cited in the tenant's 
          complaint.

               On appeal, the owner requests that the rent reduction be 
          revoked on the ground that the owner was denied due process in that 
          the Administrator failed to adhere to allegedly established 
          procedures of providing the owner with notification of either the 
          inspection or the results thereof.

               However, the Division's procedures, then as now, do not 
          require that notice of the inspection be given to the parties 
          unless their presence is required, nor to apprise the parties of 
          the result.  Moreover, the Courts have affirmed the Division's 
          position that there is no due process requirement to serve 
          inspection reports on the owner.  Empress Manor v DHCR, 538 N.Y.S. 
          2d 49 (App Div. 2nd Dept.).  The owner was afforded due process 
          notice by service of the tenant's complaint.















          ADM. REVIEW DOCKET NO.: BH - 110269 RO




               The Commissioner rejects the owner's characterization of the 
          complaint as a "fishing expedition," in "an attempt to harass the 
          owner", that "was able to find only a few minor items."  Tenants, 
          like owners, are free to pursue their legal remedies provided under 
          the Rent Stabilization Law and Code.   

               The inspection confirmed several serious conditions, including 
          defective and missing kitchen equipment, defective and missing 
          lighting fixtures, holes in walls, exposed wiring and an entire 
          apartment in need of painting.  Since the Administrator determined 
          that service decreases had occurred, rent reductions were mandated.  
          Hyde Park Gardens v DHCR, 527 N.Y.S. 2d 841 (A.D. 2nd Dept.), 
          aff'd. 541 N.Y.S. 2d 345 (Ct App. 1989).

               The owner's claim of repairs is belied by the results of the 
          inspection that confirmed several service decreases.  The owner 
          also fails to support the claim that the tenant had refused access 
          to the owner to make repairs, as would be provided by, for example, 
          advance written notice to the tenant by certified mail or mailgram 
          of scheduled appointments to effectuate repairs.

               THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the Rent 
          Stabilization Law and Code, it is

               ORDERED, that the owner's petition be denied and that the 
          Administrator's order be affirmed.

          ISSUED:


                                                                        
                                          JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                          Acting Deputy Commissioner




                                                    

    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: