DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







                                 STATE OF NEW YORK
                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                    GERTZ PLAZA
                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

     ------------------------------------X 
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO.: BC 110102-RO
                                         :  
                                            DISTRICT RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S
     THREE TOWERS ASSOCIATES                DOCKET NO.: 017172
                           PETITIONER    : 
     ------------------------------------X                             

           ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
                 AND MODIFYING DISTRICT RENT ADMINISTRATOR'S ORDER

     On  March  5,  1987,  the  above-named  owner   filed   a   petition   for
     administrative review of an order issued  on  January  30,  1987,  by  the
     District Rent Administrator concerning the housing accommodation known  as
     Apartment 15-T at 269 Grand Central Parkway, Floral Park, New York.

     The Commissioner has reviewed all of the evidence in the  record  and  has
     carefully considered that portion of the record  relevant  to  the  issues
     raised by the petition for administrative review.

     On August 7, 1984 the subject tenant filed an objection to  the  apartment
     registration, claiming, among other things, that the registration filed by 
     the owner omitted, among  other  items,  an  alarm  system  as  a  service
     provided by the owner.

     In answer the owner asserted, among other things, that the intrusion alarm 
     system had never been activated.

     In  the  order  here  under  review,  the  District   Rent   Administrator
     determined, among other  things,  that  an  alarm  system  was  a  service
     provided by the owner  and  directed  that  the  registration  be  amended
     accordingly. 

     In  this  petition,  the   owner   requests   that   the   District   Rent
     Administrator's order be modified to reflect that an alarm system is not a 
     service which the owner is required to provide at  the  subject  premises,
     since it has never been installed.

     The Commissioner is of the opinion this petition should be granted.

     The  record  discloses  that  both  during  the  proceeding   before   the
     Administrator and on administrative appeal, the owner specifically  denied
     that an alarm system is a service provided by  the  owner  asserting  that
     such a system had never been installed or activated.  Based on the owner's 
     specific  denial;  the  tenant's  failure  to  submit  any   evidence   to
     substantiate the complaint and the fact that it is unusual for an owner to 
     supply an alarm system for an apartment, the Commissioner  finds  that  an
     alarm system is not a service provided by the owner to this tenant.








          DOCKET NUMBER: BC 110102-RO
     The Administrator's order is hereby modified accordingly.

     THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, it is

     ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, granted  and  that
     the District Rent Administrator's  order  be,  and  the  same  hereby  is,
     modified as hereinabove indicated.

     ISSUED:















                                                                   
                                             ELLIOT SANDER
                                          Deputy Commissioner




                                                   
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: