DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







                                 STATE OF NEW YORK
                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                    GERTZ PLAZA
                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

     ------------------------------------X 
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO.: AJ 410510-RO
                                         :  
                                            DRO DOCKET NO.: TC 077813-G
       LINCOLN PLAZA
       ASSOCIATES          PETITIONER    : 
     ------------------------------------X                             


           ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW


     On October 14, 1986, the above-named petitioner-owner filed a petition for 
     administrative review of an order issued on September  12,  1986,  by  the
     Rent   Administrator  concerning  the  housing  accommodation   known   as
     Apartment 20C, 20 West 64th Street, New York, New York.  The Administrator 
     found that the tenant had been overcharged.

     The Commissioner has reviewed this record and  carefully  considered  that
     portion relevant to the issues raised by this appeal.

     The tenant commenced this proceeding by filing a complaint of general rent 
     overcharge.  The owner was advised to produce a full rental  history.   By
     letter dated March 27, 1986 the owner advised the Administrator  that  the
     complaining tenant (Koren Jones) was not the tenant of record.  Petitioner 
     produced evidence  that  Julian  Kaplan  was  the  tenant  of  record  and
     purchased the apartment in 1985.  The Administrator failed to  investigate
     this claim.   Instead,  petitioner  was  found  to  be  in  default.   The
     Administrator applied the procedures based on Section  42  of  the  former
     Rent Stabilization Code.  A total overcharge of $7,274.79  was  calculated
     including interest and excess security.

     On appeal, the petitioner  again  raises  the  claim  that  Jones  had  no
     standing to bring this complaint.  Annexed  to  the  petition  are  leases
     which show that Julian Kaplan was in fact, the tenant of record during the 
     period in question.  The tenant filed no response to the petition.   After
     careful consideration of the evidence in the record the Commissioner is of 
     the opinion that the petition should be granted.

     Petitioner raised the issue of Jone's  lack  of  standing  to  bring  this
     complaint before the Administrator.   The  Administrator  had  a  duty  to
     investigate but did not do so.  The petitioner submitted a complete rental 
     history to the Commissioner.  That  history  shows  that  the  complaining
     tenant was never the occupant of the subject apartment.   The  complaining
     tenant did not rebut the allegations and,  in  fact,  has  moved  with  no
     forwarding address.  The Commissioner accepts the owners offer  of  proof.
     The Administrator's order is revoked.

     THEREFORE, in accordance with the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, it is







          DOCKET NUMBER: AJ 410510-RO
     ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is,  granted  and  the
     Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby is, revoked.

     ISSUED:



                                                                   
                                             ELLIOT SANDER
                                          Deputy Commissioner




                                                   
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: