DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







          Docket Number: AJ-410349-RO
                                 STATE OF NEW YORK
                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                    GERTZ PLAZA
                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

     ------------------------------------X 
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO. AJ 410349-RO
                                         :  
          JONATHAN A. LANDERS               DISTRICT RENT ADMINISTRATOR
                                            DOCKET NO. LCS000393-B
                           PETITIONER    : 
     ------------------------------------X                           
       
           ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW

     On  October  20,  1986,  the  above-named  owner  filed  a  petition   for
     administrative review of an order  issued  on  September  15,  1986  by  a
     District Rent Administrator concerning various housing  accommodations  in
     the premises known as 222 East 10th Street, New York, New York.

     The Commissioner has reviewed all the  evidence  in  the  record  and  has
     carefully considered that portion of the record  relevant  to  the  issues
     raised by the petition for review.

     On April 9, 1985, several  tenants  filed  a  complaint  alleging  various
     decreases in required services.

     On or about April 11, 1985, the District Rent Administrator served a  copy
     of the tenants' complaint upon the owner and afforded him  an  opportunity
     to answer.

     In his answer, dated April 17, 1985, the owner denied that there were  any
     reductions in service.

     A physical inspection was conducted by an agency  inspector  on  June  23,
     1986.  The report of this  inspection  indicates  that  the  hallways  and
     stairways needed mopping and sweeping.

     On September 15, 1986 the District Rent  Administrator  issued  the  order
     here under review, reducing the regulated rents based upon a finding  that
     the public areas were in need of cleaning.

     In  his  petition  for  administrative  review,  the  owner  asserts,   in
     substance, that there is no inspection report in the file indicating  that
     the public areas were in need of cleaning; that he never  received  notice
     of the condition before the order was issued, and that  other  inspections
     showed that the owner keeps the public areas clean.

     After careful consideration the Commissioner is of the  opinion  that  the
     petition for review should be denied.

     With regard to the owner's first allegation, the Commissioner  notes  that
     the file does contain an inspection  report  indicating  that  the  public
     areas were in need of cleaning.  As to the issue  of  notice,  the  record

     shows that the owner was served with a copy  of  the  tenants'  complaint,
     which alleged as follows: "Hallways and other public areas are filthy  and






          Docket Number: AJ-410349-RO
     not regularly cleaned."  As to  the  owner's  allegation  regarding  other
     inspections, the Commissioner notes that the District Rent Administrator's 
     order was based upon the inspection conducted in  this  proceeding,  which
     disclosed that the required service of keeping the public areas clean  was
     not being maintained.  The Commissioner further notes the owner's  failure
     to specify the inspections referred to in his petition or to submit copies 
     of reports of any such alleged inspections.  Accordingly, and  based  upon
     the entire evidence of record, the Commissioner is of the opinion that the 
     petition for review should be denied.
               
     THEREFORE, in accordance with the City Rent and  Rehabilitation  Law,  the
     Rent and Eviction Regulations, and the Rent Stabilization Law and Code, it 
     is

     ORDERED, that this petition be, and the same hereby is, denied,  and  that
     the District Rent Administrator's  order  be,  and  the  same  hereby  is,
     affirmed.

     ISSUED:




                                                                   
                                     ELLIOT SANDER
                                     Deputy Commissioner




                                                   
      
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: