DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions







                                 STATE OF NEW YORK
                     DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                           OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                                    GERTZ PLAZA
                              92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                              JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433

     ------------------------------------X 
     IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE :  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
     APPEAL OF                              DOCKET NO.: AI 410032-RT
                                         :  
                                            DRO DOCKET NO.: L 3114022-R
       JONATHAN LAPIN
                           PETITIONER    : 
     ------------------------------------X                             


                   ORDER AND OPINION TERMINATING PROCEEDING AND
                       MODIFYING ORDER OF RENT ADMINISTRATOR


     On September 9, 1986 the abovenamed petitioner tenant filed a Petition for 
     Administrative Review against an order issued on August  5,  1986  by  the
     Rent Administrator concerning  the  housing  accommodations  known  as  20
     Clinton Street, Apartment 5B, Manhattan.

     The Commissioner notes that the then current owner also filed  a  petition
     which was dismissed as untimely and the owner  instituted  an  Article  78
     proceeding which was not perfected (AI 410041-RO); SJR 1838).

     The instant  order  of  the  Rent  Administrator  was  the  result  of  an
     overcharge complaint filed by the tenant on March 21, 1984 and established 
     stabilized rents and directed refunds of overcharges by the  then  current
     and prior owners.

     In his petition, the tenant does not challenge the  Administrator's  order
     but attaches a copy of a letter to the then present  and  2  prior  owners
     demanding payment in accordance with the order including treble damages.

     In response one of the owners states that the  Administrator's  order  did
     not impose  treble  damages  but  only  9%  interest  on  the  overcharges
     collected after April 1, 1984.

     As abovenoted the petition does not in itself raise a  adjudicable  issue.
     However,  to  avoid  unnecessary  confusion,  the  Commissioner  deems  it
     appropriate to point out that the  Administrator's  order  did,  in  fact,
     impose treble damages for an 11 month period after April 1,  1984.   Since
     treble damages were imposed,  interest  is  not  also  warranted  and  the
     language in the Administrator's order relating thereto is hereby deleted.

     If the owners have not already refunded or credited the  overcharges,  the
     tenant may, upon the expiration of the period  in  which  the  owners  may
     institute an Article 78 proceeding, file and enforce  the  Administrator's
     order along with this order and opinion as a judgment or offset  not  more
     than 20% per month of the overcharge occurring on and after April 1,  1984
     against any rent due the current owner, if he has not already done so.








          DOCKET NUMBER: AI 410032-RT
     THEREFORE, pursuant to Rent Stabilization Law and Code, it is

     ORDERED, that this proceeding be, and the same hereby is,  terminated  and
     that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the same hereby  is,  modified
     as above set forth and, as so modified, affirmed.

     ISSUED:



                                                                   
                                     ELLIOT SANDER
                                     Deputy Commissioner




                                                   
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: