DHCR Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) Decisions
In 1994, under pressure from tenant advocates, DHCR released approximately 6,000 PAR decisions. After Governor Pataki took office in 1995, DHCR refused to release other decisions in bulk. These decisions generally cover the 1990-1994 period and in many cases do not reflect current law or DHCR practice. The reader is cautioned to be aware of changes to the Rent Stabilization Law, the Rent Stabilization Code and DHCR practice since 1994. Also this database does not include all decisions prior to 1994 as DHCR intentionally withheld many decisions for unknown reasons.

Accessing the decisions

Search DHCR decisions by keyword

 

Note: Search must contain at least four characters.

    Contains all words
    Contains the exact phrase
    Contains at least one word
   or ... Browse decisions by docket number
   or ... Download compressed zip files of all decisions


DHCR Decisions





AI 210229 RO
                                
                        STATE OF NEW YORK
            DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL
                  OFFICE OF RENT ADMINISTRATION
                           GERTZ PLAZA
                     92-31 UNION HALL STREET
                     JAMAICA, NEW YORK 11433
                                
                                
----------------------------------x
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE     ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
APPEAL OF                               DOCKET NO.: AI 210299 RO

     MARLE REALTY CO.                   DISTRICT RENT
                                        ADMINISTRATOR'S DOCKET
NO.: 85 KCS 000323 HH
                        PETITIONER
----------------------------------x


  ORDER AND OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
                                
     On September 29, 1986 the above named petitioner-owner filed
a Petition for Administrative Review against an order of the Rent
Administrator  issued  September 8, 1986.   The  order  concerned
housing  accommodations located at 415 Ablemarle Road,  Brooklyn,
N.Y.  wherein  the  Administrator ordered  a  building-wide  rent
reduction for failure to maintain heat and hot water.

      The  Commissioner  has reviewed the  record  and  carefully
considered  that portion relevant to the issues  raised  by  this
appeal.

      On June 6, 1984 forty-four tenants began this proceeding by
filing  a building-wide complaint alleging decreased services  to
wit: inadequate heat and hot water levels and water pressure  and
noise associated with heat coming from pipes.

      Based  on  the  evidence in the record,  the  Administrator
ordered a rent reduction for the month of October, 1986.

      On  appeal the owner stated that there was no reduction  in
services  at  any  time,  that cold  water  was  provided  and/or
maintained  as  required and that a new water pressure  pump  was
installed to alleviate any pressure problems.

      The tenants, through their representative, filed a response
on  October  28,  1986  wherein it was stated  that  the  owner's
petition  offered no proof that adequate heat and hot  water  was
supplied.   The  tenants  also stated that,  while  a  new  water
pressure pump was indeed installed, the underlying problems  that
prompted  the compliant still exist.  The tenant's representative
also submitted copies of letters, dated June 1, July 1, September
1, and October 1, 1986 wherein she made specific complaints about
inadequate heat and hot water.

      After  careful  review of the evidence in the  record,  the
Commissioner  is  of  the  opinion that the  petition  should  be
denied.

      The Commissioner agrees with the tenants that the owner has
done  nothing  more  than state that there was  no  reduction  in
services and that adequate water pressure was maintained.  Absent
any  proof to that effect, the Commissioner finds that the  order
here  under review was correctly issued and, therefore,  must  be
affirmed.

      THEREFORE, pursuant to the Rent Stabilization Law and Code,
it is

      ORDERED,  that  this petition be, and the same  hereby  is,
denied, and that the Rent Administrator's order be, and the  same
hereby is, affirmed.

ISSUED:



                                   JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTA
                                   Acting Deputy Commissioner
    
   

The New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) is the state agency that administers the Rent Stabilization and Rent Control systems. DHCR has jurisdiction over many aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship, including the legal rent, the providing of various services and complaints of landlord harassment. In addition, landlords are able to apply to DHCR for increases in rent based on Major Capital Improvements or for other reasons.

Tenants and Landlords may initiate proceedings by filing complaints or applications with DHCR. After the agency collects evidence from both the tenant and landlord, it renders a decision by the District Rent Administrator (DRA) -- sometimes referred to as the District Rent Office (DRO).

Either party may then appeal the decision at the agency level by filing a Petition for Administrative Review (PAR) within 35 days. A PAR decision -- or sometimes called a Commissioner's Decision -- represents the final decision of the agency before parties may appeal in the state courts.

TenantNet Home | TenantNet Forum | New York Tenant Information | Contact Us
DHCR Information | DHCR Decisions | Housing Court Decisions | New York Rent Laws |

Subscribe to our Mailing List!
Your Email:   
Your Name: